God speaks of a time through His prophet Jeremiah where apostate Israel had scattered His true sheep and had not taken care of them (cf. Jer. 23:2). But the Lord had promised to “gather the remnant” (v. 3). The days were coming when “a Righteous Branch” (v. 5) from David would rise up as “a King who will reign wisely and do what is just and right in the land. In His days Judah will be saved and Israel will live in safety. This is the name by which He will be called: ‘The Lord Our Righteousness’” (vv. 5-6).
Ezekiel picks up on this same theme in chapter 34. The Lord through Ezekiel again talks about how the scattered remnant of His sheep that belong to Him “lacks a shepherd” and “has become food for all the wild animals” (v. 8). But the Lord says, “I will place over them one shepherd, my servant David, and he will tend them; he will tend them and be their shepherd. I the Lord will be their God, and my servant David will be prince among them. I the Lord have spoken. I will make a covenant of peace with them and rid the land of wild beasts so that they may live in the desert and sleep in the forests in safety...The trees of the field will yield their fruit and the ground will yield its crops...They will no longer be plundered by the nations, nor will wild animals devour them. They will live in safety, and no one will make them afraid” (vv. 23-24, 28). In conclusion, the Lord says, “You My sheep, the sheep of My pasture, are people, and I am your God, declares the Sovereign Lord” (v. 31).
Of course, as clearly delineated for us in verse 31, none of this is to be understood literally speaking. It is impossible to be a literalist here. Shepherds, sheep, wild and savage beasts, the desert, the forests, trees yielding their fruit and the ground yielding its crops with rich pasture lands for sheep to graze in are all literal ideas or words that are used to convey a much deeper meaning. They are literal concepts or ideas that are used to figuratively portray something far more ethereal than carnal and worldly notions or ideas. To be sure, the shepherd/prince (or “David”) is Jesus; the sheep are His chosen spiritual sheep or remnant called specifically by Him; the savage beasts are the Gentiles (and as we will see later, also apostate Jews); and the wilderness and forests are those regions where these savage beasts (the Gentiles) lurk and dwell. The “trees of the field yielding fruit” and the “the ground yielding its crops” are the evangelistic results or efforts of God’s people throughout all these forests and arid regions. And these are the same fruit trees of all kinds that Ezekiel describes planted on the banks by the river of the Water of Life whose fruit serve for food and their leaves for healing (47:12); and which even David and Jeremiah describe as of those whose leaves do not fade or wither but are always green (Psm. 1:3; 92:12-13; Jer. 17:8). Even the “land” isn’t the literal land of Palestine, but is the land wherever Christ’s sheep graze and dwell and of which He said they “come in and go out, and find pasture” (Jhn. 10:9). Is Christ talking here about literal pasture lands for His sheep to come into and go out of? Of course not! The term “pasture” (and even “land”) is being used by our Lord, and Ezekiel, in a figurative non-literal manner. And if all that is not enough and too difficult to contemplate, consider also this fact for a moment that the author of Hebrews says the patriarchs desired “a better homeland, that is, a heavenly one” (11:16, lit. trans.). For “people who talk like this make it clear that they are seeking a homeland. If they had been thinking of the homeland from which they had gone out, they would have opportunity to return. But as it is, they desire...a heavenly one” (vv. 14-16, lit. trans.). In other words, a spiritual one! Not literal land, but spiritual land; not earthly terra-firma, but heavenly terra-firma. Wherever Christ’s sheep graze and pasture, they are claiming spiritual terra-firma or ground for the kingdom of God, and are thus becoming that “great mountain” (or “My hill” here in Ezk. 34:26) that the Lord speaks about that “fills the whole earth” (Dan. 2:35) with His knowledge filling the earth as the waters cover the sea (Isa. 11:9). This also is not a literal mountain; for one literal mountain cannot physically encompass the entire earth which is round. It is Christ’s kingdom, rule and reign going forth into all the earth to conquer and plunder a people for His namesake. At the cross, Christ bound the strongman, Satan, and is now like Abraham spoiling his house and distinguishing between those who are His sheep verses those who are not. He notes His people as they pass underneath His Shepherd’s rod (Ezk. 20:37), counting one in ten that belong unto Him as typified in Lev. 27:32. (for this idea of Christ taking a people for His namesake as “plunder” or “spoil” from other nations, see also my lengthy five-part article: Lions, Tigers and Bears; Oh My!, which is a more detailed commentary on Isaiah 11; see also The Typology of the Tithe, Firstfruits and Firstborn on the Lord’s tithe being typical of His people who are set apart and chosen to belong solely and “holy” to Him).
Even “David” mentioned above in Ezekiel (and in Ezk. 37:24-25), in Jer. 30:9, and even in Hosea 3:5, isn’t to literally come back some day, as many literalists erroneously suppose, in order to rule over all natural Jews in the literal land of Palestine someday. The person of “David” here is to be understood as no more literal than the person of “Elijah” who was promised to come and to precede the coming of the Lord Jesus Christ in Malachi 4:5. For Jesus said, “‘To be sure, Elijah comes and will restore all things. But I tell you, Elijah has already come, and they did not recognize him, but have done to him everything they wished. In the same way the Son of Man is going to suffer at their hands.’ Then the disciples understood that he was talking to them about John the Baptist” (Mat. 17:11-13). Just earlier Christ had also said of this “Elijah” who was prophesied of Malachi to come, “if you are willing to accept it, he [John the Baptist] is the Elijah who was to come. Whoever has ears, let them hear” (Mat. 11:14). Are you hearing this? Are you willing to accept this? And finally, the angel Gabriel had also said to John the Baptist’s father, Zechariah: “And he [John] will go on before the Lord, in the spirit and power of Elijah” (Lke. 1:17), just as Malachi had foretold. Like Elijah who was to come, and came, and the people “did not recognize him”; so too in like manner is “David” who was to come, and came, not recognized by not a few. As John the Baptist came in the Spirit and power of Elijah, so too has Christ come in the Spirit and power of David. The former in the Spirit and power of a Prophet, the latter in the Spirit and power of a King. John exercised his authority after the manner of Elijah and thereby came in his name; Christ exercises His authority after the manner of David and thereby came in his name. Jeremiah clearly understood this and alluded to this fact when he spoke of how God would “raise up to David a righteous Branch” (23:5). And Peter likewise affirmed of David’s prophecy who said that his body would not see decay as referring to Christ’s body that would not see decay―not David’s; for, “Brothers, I can tell you confidently that the patriarch David died and was buried, and his tomb is here to this day. But he was a prophet and knew that God had promised him an oath that he would place one of his descendants on his throne. Seeing what was ahead, he [David] spoke of the resurrection of Christ, that He was not abandoned to the grave, nor did His body see decay. God has raised this Jesus to life, and we are all witnesses of the fact. Exalted to the right hand of God....God has made this Jesus...both Lord and Christ” (Acts 2:29-32, 36). Christ now, not later, sits on David’s throne ruling from heaven over not only the earth but over heaven and earth. The keys of David that were passed on to one of David’s descendents, Eliakim, who ruled as a palace administrator for Hezekiah (or for David's house) in Isaiah 22:22, Christ now says such authority over David’s house has been passed over unto Him: “These are the words of Him who is holy and true, who holds the key of David. What He opens no one can shut, and what He shuts no one can open” (Rev. 3:7). The tabernacle (or house) of David that had fallen down, is now being rebuilt through the administration of Christ’s rule and reign (Amos 9:11-12; Acts 15:16-17). And to all who overcome as Christ did, Christ says He will “give the right to sit with Me on My throne, just as I overcame and sat down with My Father on His throne” (v. 21). Have no doubt about it, Christ is now seated as a King on David’s throne ruling and reigning from heaven. His throne is never to be an earthly throne like the other kingdoms of this world, but a heavenly throne; His kingdom is not of this world, but from “another place” (cf. Jhn. 18:36-37). In fact, the Old Testament says that David’s throne was indeed God’s throne (cf. 1Chr. 29:23), with David ruling as one of God’s co-regents, not so dissimilar to us now being also co-regents together with Christ in heaven and also here on earth (cp. Eph. 2:6; Rom. 5:17; 1Cor. 4:8; see also Rev. 5:10 in ASV for “and they reign” now, not “shall reign”); therefore Christ’s (or God’s) throne could be none other than David’s throne but with the difference being that He is now ruling on it from heaven. And if He were not ruling from heaven, then all rule, authorities, powers and dominions would have remained over Him and not “under” Him. But Scripture says He is “far above” them all (Eph. 1:21f), just a kings are suppose to be.
Now, more particularly, here in Ezekiel 34 God also says that His flock “has become food for all the wild animals” (v. 34), and that God would “rid the land [or His pasture] of wild beasts so that His flock may live in the desert and sleep in the forests in safety” (v. 25). This idea is repeated again in verse 28. What are these arid “desert” regions and “forests,” where these “wild animals” or “beasts” live and where God’s flock is to live and dwell in safety? They are the arid regions and forests of ungodly people throughout the world, such as the “forests” of those mentioned who belong to the king of Assyria as depicted in Isaiah 10:18-19 whose “splendor of his forests and fertile fields” God will “completely destroy” and where “the remaining trees of his forests will be so few that a child could write them down.” It is such regions as these that are spiritually dry and arid and lack God’s refreshing living waters. Christ was, and is, changing all of this wherever His water of life flows into the hearts and lives of His sheep which are scattered throughout all the world like sheep without a shepherd. They are His lost sheep of the house of Israel and His “other sheep” out of the Gentiles that He had said He must also gather (Jhn. 10:16; cp. Jhn. 11:52). All such “desert” and arid regions as these “will be glad and blossom like the rose” (Isa. 35:1); “then will the eyes of the blind be opened and the ears of the deaf unstopped...water will gush forth in the wilderness and streams in the desert. The burning sand will become a pool, the thirsty ground bubbling springs....And a highway will be there; it will be called the Way of Holiness” (vv. 5-8).
So what, or who, are these “wild beasts” or “wild animals”? Clearly, as was said earlier, all of this is to be understood figuratively. None of this is to be interpreted literally. Real concepts and ideas are being used to figuratively portray an underlying concept or idea. “Wild beasts” and undomesticated animals in Scripture are everywhere typically denoted as the Gentiles; whereas those animals that are domesticated, such as sheep, are typically portrayed as those who belong to the Lord. Thus there are domesticated animals verses undomesticated animals; clean verses unclean; wild verses tame. But God through His prophets Jeremiah and Ezekiel (not to mention all of the other prophets) promises to one day unite these unclean, unruly and wild animals with the domesticated ones in order that they may all live together harmoniously. And this was portrayed for us in Peter’s vision in the sheet coming down out of heaven where he was told to eat all unclean animals that he had never eaten before, and where both Jews and Gentiles are now to dwell together.
Now what I will attempt to do in this article is to apply what the Reformers referred to as, “The Analogy of Faith.” Though not the only principle used in interpreting the Scriptures, the “analogy of faith” was a key principle of interpretation understood by the Reformers which teaches that Scriptures are normally sufficient within themselves to provide for us an understanding or “interpretation” of what God Himself has said to us on any given subject. Scripture normally is self-interpreting. When I say “normally,” what I mean is that sometimes history determines for us how something is to be interpreted, or understood, such as in the actual outworking and fulfillment of the prophecies of Daniel and of Nebuchadnezzar’s dream. But the actual meanings and concepts behind the literal words or ideas being used to depict those things are to be interpreted solely by God’s word alone. For example, when Daniel uses images of lions, bears, and leopards, Scripture elsewhere affirms to us that God uses such imagery to denote the ferocious behavior and hostility of certain kingdoms or peoples. And what better way to convey the ferocious behavior of these people and kingdoms than by using such graphic images of “wild beasts” to convey to our minds what God is trying to tell us. They strike terror and fear into all of those who would ever come near such animals. These animals are more powerful than us, and we know very well that we are to keep our distance from them. So, when Isaiah 11 talks about such carnivorous animals as lying together with other animals not of the same nature with them all eating the same food—in light of what has just been said—what do you think he (or “God”) is attempting to illustrate to those of us with the ears to hear and the eyes to see? Sadly, many have put a bent or interpretation upon these passages of Scripture, and others similar to them, with thoughts or ideas that come naturally to them through their own natural reasoning minds. But this is not how the meaning of what God is saying to us is to be understood here. In other words, the sense or meaning is not to be ascertained through carnal and natural reasoning minds; but is to be understood by having our senses exercised to discern what God means by what He says through other verses of Scripture. This is comparing Scripture with Scripture, and not through our own human logic or reasoning. This is why many in our midst still fail to believe that Elijah who was to come was John the Baptist. Their natural reasoning minds cannot comprehend that. And so we still have with us today some who will say that this prophecy concerning Elijah to come in Malachi must still be literally fulfilled in the physical return of Elijah someday in the future.
I think a very important “interpretive key” into gaining the wisdom and understanding behind the words that God uses in Isaiah chapter eleven, especially with His usage there of domesticated and undomesticated animals, is to be found in Jer. 5:6 and in the verses before and after this verse. As said before, God’s own Word will interpret His Word for us, if we will just let Him do so. His Word is the last Word on all of this, not our own fanciful theories and private speculations. If we search His Word diligently “for understanding proverbs and parables, the sayings and riddles of the wise….If you look for it as for silver and search for it as for hidden treasure, then you will understand the fear of the Lord and find the knowledge of God” (Pro. 1:6; 2:4).
There is much more elsewhere said in God’s Word that will help us to understand and get the sense of these words in Isaiah 11, but for now we will begin with the words of the prophet Jeremiah. Jeremiah writes:
“Therefore a lion from the forest will attack them, a wolf from the desert will ravage them, a leopard will lie in wait near their towns to tear to pieces any who venture out, for their rebellion is great and their backslidings many” (5:6).At first glance, on the surface this really does sound like God is referring to literal animals that were to ravage Israel. But let me just say right from the start that God is not talking about literal “lions,” “wolves,” or “leopards” here. “Wait a minute now,” someone will say, “what makes you so sure? Who do you think you are? Do you think you have a handle on the interpretation of Scriptures that others don’t seem to have?” At first glance I know that it sounds like I have missed the mark. I’m just, “one of those Amillennialists who sees everything in a figurative or spiritual manner.” So how can I make such a blunt statement, being so sure of myself? Please bear with me for just a moment, and let’s continue with the narrative. Remember, not I, nor anyone else for that matter, are the interpreters of God’s Word here, God is. God means what He says, and He says what He means.
First of all, the text says that the leopards will watch over all of Israel’s cities and tear any (or all) who would attempt to venture out. That is the first little “red flag” here that should let us know that God is not talking about literal leopards lying in wait outside of every city. Why not? Because there would have to be one in and around every single city and town in Israel. And every person that would attempt to leave one of these “towns” would be ravaged by these leopards—every single one of them! This is a literal impossibility! It can’t happen as such. There would have to be hundreds of thousands of leopards devouring hundreds of thousands of people, and every single person at that. Many times God does this with such language in the Bible to let us know that He is not talking about something that is to be understood literally, but figuratively speaking. Jesus did this often with words. Even when He made the claim: “Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up,” He did not have a literal temple in mind. Such a feat of rebuilding such a temple in three days is a literal, physical impossibility. And the natural thinking and reasoning Jews understood this in their reply to Jesus’ words. Clearly Jesus, as well as Jeremiah, and many more of the prophets, have many things to say to us that go way beyond a literal, physical understanding, and are only to be figuratively understood. To be certain, all of these things were to literally occur, but not in the way that we think that they were to “literally” occur. We will find this to be the case with this type of genre of speech repeatedly throughout the Bible. And like John the Baptist whom we talked about earlier being “Elijah who was to come” spoken of by Malachi, we will never know the meaning of much of what the prophets are saying until God reveals it to us in His Scriptures that He wrote. No prophecy is of a “private interpretation,” which is so prevalent today in the Church. Again, God means what He says, and says what He means by such sayings. He needs no help from us.
Secondly, God says He was going to punish Israel for their sins by these “wild beasts” referred to as a “lion,” a “wolf,” and a “leopard.” Notice what He says in verses 9-10:
Should I not punish them for this? declares the LORD. Should I not avenge myself on such a nation as this? Go through her vineyards and ravage them, but do not destroy them completely. Strip off her branches, for these people do not belong to the LORD.Again, at first glance it seems that God is still talking about sending these wild, untamed animals throughout Israel. But pay attention to what God has just said in verse 10: “but do not destroy them completely.” Hold your finger there, and now continue to read the rest of the chapter, and even into chapter 6:1 and the verses following. Especially pertinent to a proper understanding of all of this is chapter 5:15-18. In verse 15 God says: “I am bringing a distant nation against you” (cp. 6:1). And in verses 16-17 He adds: “all of them are mighty warriors. They will devour your harvests and food, devour your sons and your daughters; they will devour your vines [the vineyards of v. 10] and your fig trees. With the sword they will destroy the fortified cities in which you trust.” Now this doesn’t sound like “literal” animals that are to “devour” Israel, does it? Now having been told to keep your finger on verse 10, begin to read verse 18. Notice what it says, “Yet even in those days,” declares the LORD, “I will not destroy you completely.” The analogy of the animals used that would “not destroy them completely,” are now to be understood of the distant nation that was to ravage and devour Israel and, “not destroy you completely.” God said this again just moments earlier with regards to this distant nation who were the Babylonians in 4:27, “The whole land will be ruined, though I will not destroy it completely.” The parallelisms are striking. There can be no doubt whatsoever that God is using these wild animals as descriptive terms for this heathen nation from the north that was going to ravage and devour God’s people. Stationed at the gates of every city of those who would attempt to flee were thousands upon thousands of the armies of the Babylonians, and not literal leopards, who were just denoted earlier also for us by Jeremiah: “they surround her [Israel] like men guarding a field” (4:16). It was even as Isaiah denotes: “Your choicest valleys are full of chariots, and horsemen are posted at the city gates” (22:7); and, again, the Lord through Ezekiel also affirms: “So that the hearts may melt and the fallen be many, I have stationed the sword for slaughter at all their gates” (21:15). So basically what we have here in Jeremiah is a parable, accompanied by an interpretation, something to be had in common frequently with Christ’s teachings. And as Christ said, some will comprehend the mysteries that He speaks of, while others will not. For to only some it is given to know the mysteries of the kingdom. All others will be left in the dark scratching their heads.
David similarly uses such language when denoting the ungodly, wherein the word “dog” could just as easily be exchanged for that denoting “wolves,”
Each evening they come back, howling like dogs and prowling about the city. They wander about for food and growl if they do not get their fill” (Psm. 59:14-15, ESV).The similarity between what David says here with regards to these “dogs,” and what Jeremiah says with regards to “wolves” is striking. Both “howl,” both “prowl,” and both “wonder about for food” to “devour your harvests and food.” Literal animals are no where to be understood in any of these instances. All of this is highly figurative language—the highly figurative language of God that only those with the ears to hear, can hear! Once again, in Psalm 80:8 and 13, the Psalmist likens Israel to a vine with grapes on it, and speaks of the Gentiles as “boars from the forest” who ravage it, and as “the wild beasts of the field” who feed on it.
Please click here for part two.